The Springwater
Preservation Committee
Springwater Preservation Committee |
|
Home | Meetings | News | Pictures | Wind Power | Stories | Links | About Us | Contact Us |
|
|
|
Bitter
feud; Wind farm controversy is taking its toll on small town politics By Elizabeth Simmons, Livingston County News The passion with which residents told the town board May
15 their feelings on the proposed Bishop Wind Farm is the very force that
some residents say is pitting neighbors against neighbors. The Springwater Town Board held a public hearing Sunday
to gauge the public's views on a proposed 14-turbine wind farm to be erected
in East Springwater. "[This rift] is what this company is banking
on," said Susan Kemp-Conge. She told the crowd that the issue has pitted
friends, family and neighbors against each other. Astronomer Russ Dudash also
pointed out the animosity between friends at the informational meeting held
at the fire hall last month, declaring it die biggest loss - regardless if
the towers go up or not. Not all have let matters come between them. After her
husband Richard Shearer had given his opinion against the issue, Debbie Lewis
returned to the podium to say that she is in favor because she believes that
some steps have got to be taken to secure a source of alternative energy. In
order lo accomplish this, Lewis said she thinks there will be "some
sacrifices we'll have to make." Shearer had told the board he opposed
the wind farm proposal because of the way it has been handled. He believes
there should be controls, such as zoning in place. Bridgett Moyer also strongly advocated the need for zoning to the board. The project has caused Moyer disappointment most of all because she believes the town board should protect its residents by having a vision of what they want the area to be. She referred to the town as a "free-for-all" which could allow landfills to be built anywhere. Some residents oppose controlled development through a
master plan and zoning. "It shouldn't involve the public," said
Rodney Vierhile, adding that the issue is between private landowners and the
energy developers. "People are sticking their noses in where they don't
belong." A handful of supporters spoke in favor of the project
Sunday, among a majority of wind farm opponents. "Everyone agrees that
we have an energy problem," said Francis Tessina of the proposal.
"But nobody wants to do it in their own town. I encourage the board to
consider both sides and do your own research." Tessina, a former
resident of Rochester, has lived in the area for three years. He was
surprised by some applause when he was finished with his comment. "It is
a special place," he says of Springwater. "And if I truly thought
this would ruin the area; I would not be in favor of this." Written statements were accepted up until May 14, but the
board extended the deadline by taking some written "votes" Sunday. The Springwater Preservation Committee, formed by
citizens in opposition to the project, have been urging the board to issue a
moratorium to delay any wind power development in the town until regulations
have been put into place. The results of this hearing will be used to help
the board decide if they will do so. Supervisor Mark Walker said the next step will be determined at the June 6 town meeting. Walker confirmed that the negative opinions were indeed in the majority. |